: Driven: the first Evo X in Britain-AUTOCAR.co.uk


boy36
12-23-2007, 07:34 PM
What is it?

Version 10 of the car that was supposed to provide the same halo effect to Mitsubishi’s dowdy range of cars as the VW Golf GTi does to the Golf model line-up. But never managed anything like the same success.

This is the first time anyone has driven the Evo X in the UK; its performance on our roads will be the benchmark against which the new Subaru Impreza STi will be measured when it comes to Britain in February.

Historically the Evo has always been a sharper driving machine than the Subaru, but will this new version, tested here in base GS 300 guise, and with a predicted price of around Ł27,000, have lost some of the sparkle that characterised its progenitors?

What’s it like?

Not far from what you’d expect. This was a pre-homologation version with no miles on the clock, and it was tighter than Colin Goodwin in a pricy restaurant. The motor was smooth, throttle response good and the boost arrived so calmly that it barely felt turbocharged. So much for the histrionics of Evos past.

The Evo X gearchange feels identical to that of the last car, and the five before that. And the interior, now with attractive instruments and a large sat-nav screen plonked on the dash, still has an air of budget-ness about it that leaves the Evo feeling far cheaper than any VW group hot hatch.

Awesome handling was always this car's trade for questionable interior quality, though, and this new one still offers the kind of all-weather abilities that will allow the Evo X driver to disappear from most other road cars at this time of year.

Using Mitsubishi’s AYC (anti yaw control) differentials, the car can simply be pointed at a turn, steered to the apex and then driven away. If it senses understeer you can feel it trim the axle at fault. Likewise, if the car wants to oversteer, torque shifts forwards and the car slings forwards with little drama. This used to be the Evo's USP; today, many other all-wheel drive systems manage such tricks. But what still sets the Evo apart is how neutral and unaffected it feels from behind the wheel.

The steering rack is fast-paced – about as quick as most of us can manage in a saloon car without it seeming too pointy. However, the ride comfort is poor: the car is busy everywhere, and the dampers only seem to work at higher speeds. In town, it crashes about with little compliance.

And the fuel tank is still too small, making for a range that's quite pathetic. But on the plus side, the car now has 12,500 mile service intervals, which is a huge improvement over the outgoing model.

Should I buy one?

The world of the budget performance car has changed beyond recognition in the past few years. An Audi S3 feels just as quick as this car (even if the numbers suggest it shouldn’t) and yet its fit and finish are in a different league.

Despite some clean lines and an impressive jawline, this new Evo has somehow lost most of the homologation appeal of versions five, six and seven, too; it's just not as dramatic to look at as Evos have been. The twin outlet exhaust box is especially apologetic.

So you'll need to really love the Evo X's full-blooded, maximum adrenaline character to justify buying one. And you’ll need to be committed, too. It’ll be expensive to run, and the performance no longer blows your mind – although experience tells us that these cars do loosen considerably with age.

Mainstream rivals are a safer bet, without a doubt, but there are still few cars that flatter a driver like this one.

http://www.autocar.co.uk/CarReviews/FirstDrives/Mitsubishi-Evo-Evo-X/228323/

http://www.autocar.co.uk/contentImages//Car/Mitsubishi/Evo/EvoX4drSaloon/17127723032.jpg

_Chris_
12-23-2007, 07:41 PM
Using Mitsubishi’s AYC (anti yaw control) differentials, the car can simply be pointed at a turn, steered to the apex and then driven away. If it senses understeer you can feel it trim the axle at fault. Likewise, if the car wants to oversteer, torque shifts forwards and the car slings forwards with little drama. This used to be the Evo's USP; today, many other all-wheel drive systems manage such tricks. But what still sets the Evo apart is how neutral and unaffected it feels from behind the wheel.



He meant ACTIVE YAW CONTROL :)

cksdayoff
12-23-2007, 09:12 PM
thanks for the link.

LowUFO
12-23-2007, 09:30 PM
Now thats a better review than all the usual reviews so far.

Kooldino
12-23-2007, 10:05 PM
He meant ACTICE YAW CONTROL :)

Yeah, I see so many flaws in many of these articles.

Kooldino
12-23-2007, 10:05 PM
Now thats a better review than all the usual reviews so far.


I disagree. It definitely seems more negative than most of the reviews I've read. Most editors really like the car, but he wasn't too in love with it.

LowUFO
12-24-2007, 12:16 AM
No, but he talked about things the others haven't. Like real time driving around town and how it doesn't like it. And he mentions the small gas tank and longer service intervals and even the quick steering rack. I haven't really heard or read anyone talking about those things.

Jackygor
12-24-2007, 02:04 AM
No, but he talked about things the others haven't. Like real time driving around town and how it doesn't like it. And he mentions the small gas tank and longer service intervals and even the quick steering rack. I haven't really heard or read anyone talking about those things.

I guess it is all relevant when it comes to how harsh the evo x is, most reviews just says that the ride is much improved over the evo 9.

Kooldino
12-24-2007, 02:13 AM
I've heard people talking about the quick steering rack, but not the small gas tank or longer service intervals.

R_E_X
12-24-2007, 02:14 AM
Well, I'm not a fan of Subaru...

I didn't like em at all...because my brother said that Subaru (boxers engine) drinks more oil (yes, engine oil) and drink gasoline a lot more than Evo does...not to mention they eat rubber too (after all, they are the same 4WD)

I don't know for sure that this is true or not

Why don't you buy Evo instead?(she didn't drink oil and gasoline as much as Subaru do)

EVOXGSR
12-24-2007, 02:38 AM
Yeah, he didn't really seem to lilke it very much. I think the only thing people REALLY miss about the evo is the old turbo surge that seems gone in this one; probably because of the smaller turbo. It's funny, one of the things that made me fall in the love with evos was riding in my buddy's evo 9, and feeling how the power pulled hard all the way to redline, unlike my sti, where the power plummets 1200 rpms before redline. I think mitsu should have kept the 16g instead of going to the 15g. I understand that turbo lag had been criticized a bit in the past, but the monstrous surge of power that it gave when it finally spooled up was always given praise and considered part of the car's appeal. So I look at it this way; the car's still an extremely agile machine that handles better than almost anything else out there, and with a reflash and exhaust that "rush" of acceleration will be back, and the car looks much better than ever before. I wish it could be a bit more powerful out of the box, but you can't have your cake and eat it too, I suppose.