http://images4.worldcarfans.com/spyphotos/6070703.002/6070703.002.mini1L.jpg

http://images4.worldcarfans.com/spyphotos/6070703.002/6070703.002.mini2L.jpg

http://images4.worldcarfans.com/spyphotos/6070703.002/6070703.002.mini3L.jpg

http://images4.worldcarfans.com/spyphotos/6070703.002/6070703.002.mini4L.jpg

http://images4.worldcarfans.com/spyphotos/6070703.002/6070703.002.mini5L.jpg

http://images4.worldcarfans.com/spyphotos/6070703.002/6070703.002.mini6L.jpg

http://images4.worldcarfans.com/spyphotos/6070703.002/6070703.002.mini7L.jpg

http://images4.worldcarfans.com/spyphotos/6070703.002/6070703.002.mini8L.jpg

http://images4.worldcarfans.com/spyphotos/6070703.002/6070703.002.mini9L.jpg

Not bad, although the wing looks tacked on.

It's even a different car from the one that was rocking the ring recently...

http://www.evoxforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=209

The wing actually looks even more tacked-on than on the current evos.. specifically in this pic: http://images4.worldcarfans.com/spyphotos/6070703.002/6070703.002.mini9L.jpg

At least it matches up with some lines on the car (yeah, I'm lookin at you STi)

lol

http://images4.worldcarfans.com/spyphotos/6070703.002/6070703.002.mini3L.jpg


http://evoxforums.com/pre_forum/images/006_normal.jpg

The biggest things that set this apart from the concept X are...

1-the fenders. The concept's fenders were WAY hotter.

2-The hood/bumper. They introduced a new line with the prototype. It doesn't look as smooth since the hood now doesn't reach the end of the car.

3-Headlights. The concept had meaner looking eyes.

Also, the side mirrors suck in comparison to even the prototype.

http://evoxforums.com/pre_forum/images/12-2008-mitsubishi-prototype-x.jpg


See if you can't spot any differences:
http://evoxforums.com/pre_forum/FrameSet.htm

As soon as I get mine, I'll be doing all I can to make it look more like the concept. lol.

Yeah those fenders from the concept were very droolworthy. I knew only Mazda could pull off sexy fenders like that on a production car.

I'm still crossing my fingers that the headlights from the prototype make it to the final one, and they were just using the boring 'normal' lancer headlights as part of the camo for testing purposes.

I still don't get why they did that crap with the hood/bumper. Why add an additional panel seam to the car?

Am I the only one that thinks the prototype was absolutely perfect? Yeah it lost the aggressive headlights of the concept, added that seam between the front bumper and the hood, and sorta lost the coolness of the fenders from the concept, but it was still a mean looking machine.

This test mule has looks that aren't even on-par with the evo IX.. it lost most of the agressiveness due to the headlights they slapped on it,

If they made it look exactly like the prototype, it'd be the meanest production car ever!

I'm still crossing my fingers that the headlights from the prototype make it to the final one, and they were just using the boring 'normal' lancer headlights as part of the camo for testing purposes.

I sincerely doubt it the comcept lights will make it to production. It would require the hood and bumper to be changed.

I still don't get why they did that crap with the hood/bumper. Why add an additional panel seam to the car?

Beats me. I'm mad at them for it though.

Am I the only one that thinks the prototype was absolutely perfect?

(I think you mean CONCEPT) No, you're not the only one.

Yeah it lost the aggressive headlights of the concept, added that seam between the front bumper and the hood, and sorta lost the coolness of the fenders from the concept, but it was still a mean looking machine.

This test mule has looks that aren't even on-par with the evo IX.. it lost most of the agressiveness due to the headlights they slapped on it,

If they made it look exactly like the prototype, it'd be the meanest production car ever!


*concept.

:iagree:

Now you're confusing it even more. I meant concept and prototype exactly as written in my post. The prototype headlights are the exact same shape as the base lancer lights, but look a HELL of a lot nicer (projectors, looks like LED turn signals, etc).

Yes, the concept looked awesome but at this point it isn't happening. The prototype is still totally feasible, as it appears to be fully based off the production lancer body.

Ah, ok.

Me, I liked the Concept the best.

Ah, ok.

Me, I liked the Concept the best.

no doubt, but it's too far gone now.. not happening. At least the prototype shares .. the front door panels and glass with the base lancer.. and possibly the headlights now too :(

lol :)

^Hi2u Amuse. Welcome to the forums.

@Kansei (http://www.evoxforums.com/forums/member.php?u=39) - I hear ya, bud. I'm hoping Mitsu gets the balls back to make it more aggressive. And if they don't, hopefully the aftermarket companies produce the parts to make it more Concept and/or Prototype looking.

the wheels are so weak but it's still sweet

more shots http://www.motorauthority.com/cars/mitsubishi/production-ready-mitsubishi-evo-x-caught-in-the-wild/

http://www.motorauthority.com/wp-content/uploads/Mitsubishi/EvoX/spy1/DSC_0239_small.jpg

I'm still crossing my fingers for meaner* headlights on the 'real deal' model. I'm guessing they are just trying to keep people guessing, because I seriously doubt those mirrors come on anything other than like an outlander :P are they even painted??

*by meaner I mean projector, HID, and black housing

the current RS comes with unpainted mirrors

the current RS comes with unpainted mirrors


true true, this could be an RS model they're testing. I really like that they sell the RS model, sneaks it in right under 30k dollars with performance close to that of the MR

http://www.motorauthority.com/wp-content/uploads/Mitsubishi/EvoX/spy1/DSC_0143.jpg

http://www.motorauthority.com/wp-content/uploads/Mitsubishi/EvoX/spy1/DSC_0220.jpg

http://www.motorauthority.com/wp-content/uploads/Mitsubishi/EvoX/spy1/DSC_0225.jpg

http://www.motorauthority.com/wp-content/uploads/Mitsubishi/EvoX/spy1/DSC_0227.jpg

http://www.motorauthority.com/wp-content/uploads/Mitsubishi/EvoX/spy1/DSC_0145.jpg

Unveiled Photos from JDM brochure

http://i64.photobucket.com/albums/h195/CKsDayOff/17254305.jpg

http://i64.photobucket.com/albums/h195/CKsDayOff/17254301.jpg

http://i64.photobucket.com/albums/h195/CKsDayOff/17254304.jpg

http://i64.photobucket.com/albums/h195/CKsDayOff/17254302.jpg

http://i64.photobucket.com/albums/h195/CKsDayOff/9d314777.jpg

http://i64.photobucket.com/albums/h195/CKsDayOff/17254306.jpg

lower lip is different.most aftermarket wont make parts as soon as it is released it may take up to a year or so before making performance parts.i think the ones that will be available will be cosmetic.like lights add on lips and such.i amy get this plus a supersnake shelby.

Well at this point I WILL be buying this car, yeah I wish it more like the concept but I plan on puttin my personal touches on it anyway. My only problem now is Manual or SST... decisions decisions

more shots http://www.motorauthority.com/cars/mitsubishi/production-ready-mitsubishi-evo-x-caught-in-the-wild/

http://www.motorauthority.com/wp-content/uploads/Mitsubishi/EvoX/spy1/DSC_0239_small.jpg

I'm digging those wheels.

Well at this point I WILL be buying this car, yeah I wish it more like the concept but I plan on puttin my personal touches on it anyway. My only problem now is Manual or SST... decisions decisions

I hear that one. I'm leaning towards manual, but SST would be nice for a change.

Well - I am seriously considering this car now. The production shots look great. Not as good as the Concept and Prototype shots (to me), but close enough I think. I'm also considering the GTR. Now - if only they were better on gas (lol).

I hear that one. I'm leaning towards manual, but SST would be nice for a change.

As much as they have done for to this car new engine, new tranny, upgraded AYC and ACD not to mention the active sport brakes it would seem ashame not to get the SST, but even Mitsu said to get the best acceleration get the manual... plus we don't even know how the SST will take to HP/Torque upgrades.

Well - I am seriously considering this car now. The production shots look great. Not as good as the Concept and Prototype shots (to me), but close enough I think. I'm also considering the GTR. Now - if only they were better on gas (lol).

I'm with you 100% here. The Concept made me all hot in the pants, the Prototype was great, and the Production looks damn good, but it could be better. No worries though, I can do a little cosmetic work on a car for a change.

And yes, GTR for me.

but even Mitsu said to get the best acceleration get the manual...

On the contrary...

http://www.evoxforums.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=126&d=1185804482

I was refering to this comment on Mitsu site in the news section

Automated Manual Transmission
Prototype X is equipped with the automated manual transmission with magnesium steering wheel paddle shifters that will be available on the next Lancer Evolution. This new transmission will offer lightning fast, paddle-shift actuated shifting when desired, along with offering a fully automatic mode. This unit is not a conventional torque-converter automatic transmission, but rather a true auto-capable manual similar to that used on some of the world's most notable performance models. For stick shift purists, the next Lancer Evolution will still offer a conventional 5-speed manual transmission. With the 4B11 turbo engine's stronger torque performance, a 5-speed will provide optimal acceleration response.

theres no power interruption ith the sst it just engages it self when ready.so it will be faster then a manual tranny when someone is shifting it.

this car will kick ass and tear another asholes in those sti's.
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/GeneralFuture/articleId=121744?imw=Y

O yeah I agree completely but I think it refers to launching.

No rumours of launch control with the SST? Just curious.

I haven't heard anything but I do think it will have some sort of protection involved. To be honest if the SST responds well to upgrades I will get it. It just seems like it belongs with the car.

two 3 speed trannys likes the vdubs have or will have.

Thats what SST is Twin Clutch-SST (Sport Shift Transmission) systematic, the answer to VWs DSG

Hello to all,

I'm from Singapore. I'm also waiting to get my hands on the evo X but not sure if MT or SST.

Twin-clutch has one clutch for gears 1,3,5 & another clutch for gears 2,4,6. So the change will be lightning fast but, reliability??? That's my concern. Hope the Mitsubishi engineers test this SST damn good.

I was refering to this comment on Mitsu site in the news section

Automated Manual Transmission
Prototype X is equipped with the automated manual transmission with magnesium steering wheel paddle shifters that will be available on the next Lancer Evolution. This new transmission will offer lightning fast, paddle-shift actuated shifting when desired, along with offering a fully automatic mode. This unit is not a conventional torque-converter automatic transmission, but rather a true auto-capable manual similar to that used on some of the world's most notable performance models. For stick shift purists, the next Lancer Evolution will still offer a conventional 5-speed manual transmission. With the 4B11 turbo engine's stronger torque performance, a 5-speed will provide optimal acceleration response.

I think "response" is the key word there.

I'm generally seeing that mitsu is pushing the SST box. The image I posted above just backs up what I'm saying.

I guess we'll know for sure after they're released in Japan.

No rumours of launch control with the SST? Just curious.

Not sure. However, in the video posted in that thread (that mitsu had removed from youtube), I recall the driver launching hard from a dead stop with the SST box.

Hello to all,

I'm from Singapore. I'm also waiting to get my hands on the evo X but not sure if MT or SST.

Welcome! Perhaps you will get the car before we do?

Twin-clutch has one clutch for gears 1,3,5 & another clutch for gears 2,4,6. So the change will be lightning fast but, reliability??? That's my concern. Hope the Mitsubishi engineers test this SST damn good.

Keep your fingers crossed.

Has anyone seen a torque converter mentioned for the SST anywhere. I would think that with a stall of around 2800-3200 lauches would be really good. I'm Rick BTW...been lurking for a while!!!

Arrival in Dec 07.

Has anyone seen a torque converter mentioned for the SST anywhere. I would think that with a stall of around 2800-3200 lauches would be really good. I'm Rick BTW...been lurking for a while!!!

There is no torque converter in the SST. Its essentially an manual without the actual clutch you step on.

:tmyk:

Has anyone seen a torque converter mentioned for the SST anywhere. I would think that with a stall of around 2800-3200 lauches would be really good. I'm Rick BTW...been lurking for a while!!!

Hey Rick (bud?) Welcome to the forums!

As for a torque converter, it looks like there won't be one on this trans, being as it works pretty much like a typical manual trans with a few extra bells and whistles.

Launch control is another story altogether.

Arrival in Dec 07.

Looks like you'll get it before us!

[QUOTE=Kooldino;6808]I think "response" is the key word there.

I'm generally seeing that mitsu is pushing the SST box. The image I posted above just backs up what I'm saying.

O don't get me wrong I hope the SST performs just as well as the manual it just seems from reading that a manual will have better acceleration. I mean doute they will put down there own product so they would be careful how they word it.

http://www.autogespot.com/log/images/07-2007/lamevo/640/5.jpg
http://www.autogespot.com/log/images/07-2007/lamevo/640/6.jpg
http://www.autogespot.com/log/images/07-2007/lamevo/640/7.jpg
http://www.autogespot.com/log/images/07-2007/lamevo/640/8.jpg

aside from pic 6, those are all the 'ralliart' model.. good to see some pics of that too!

Hello to all I'm new to the forum :) came across this forum from a fellow member of the OzEvo forum.

I too hope very much to be able to get one of these new Evo 10's :)

I would also prefer the get one with SST, this car has definitely been made for it, hopefully it will be stronger/more reliable than the DSG used on the VW's as I've heard of a few hacking up and also VW tuners out there have different power up tunes for either DSG or standard manual, the DSG tune being lower power and torque levels for reliability....

I hope Mitsu has made their SST strong enough to handle major power upgrades.

In terms of SM vs SST for quickness, I have no doubt the SST will outperform the SM, all you have to do is look at the VW DSG equipped cars for a reference, the DSG variant of any type, always has the quickest times.

Can't wait for it to be released and see some actual real info, comments etc. etc.

BTW I too also 'dream' of owning the new GT-R Godzilla, maybe one day :)

Welcome to the site!

since most people on here are in the united states, don't expect there to be much activity for the next 7 hours or so (it's 23:30 here on the east coast)..

but once the work day starts there's a bunch of us blabbing on here. :)

Thankyou Chris :)

Yes, it's quite a different timeline - almost mid night there and mid day over here....(ie:Melbourne Australia)

Cheers, look forward to interacting with you all :)

BTW I too also 'dream' of owning the new GT-R Godzilla, maybe one day :)

I have a plan and would also like to get to own / drive the new GT-R Godzilla our getaway car can be the EVO X SST , and i will supply the balaclavas and the :uzi: :popcorn: if we are succesfull we can buy the Godzilla LOL, LOL .

The last i heard the price of the Godzilla will be around $170,000 AUD

Cheers
Michael

Hi Michael, yes I suspected as much......ie: a price tag of at least 150k+ for a new GT-R for the Aust. market.

Still IMHO if it lives up to all the claims, comparatively speaking it's worth every cent....I love the look of the thing and the interior is meant to be something very special as well, compared to past models :)

Also it too, will feature some type of SST transmission, I've read it'll be a 7 speader, I look forward to this car with as much anticipation as the new Evo 10 :)

I would also prefer the get one with SST, this car has definitely been made for it, hopefully it will be stronger/more reliable than the DSG used on the VW's as I've heard of a few hacking up and also VW tuners out there have different power up tunes for either DSG or standard manual, the DSG tune being lower power and torque levels for reliability....



Hey, I am from Sri Lanka and interesting comments from u…. as for me I use Evos for competition (circuit & rallying) & have used many models in past & currently using Evo 9 GT (JDM version) since April 2005.

As my application of usage is much different to most forum member here, I am lost big time not being able to figure out if I shud go for the RS with 5 M/T or the GSR with SST (I don’t mind the additional 120kgs in GSR). I have driven the Golf GTi with the DSG & the acceleration is pretty impressive for that class of vehicle.

Have u heard any reliability issues with the DSG when upgrades are done…. I am trying to get much info as poss as I have to decide if it is a RS or GSR with SST for competition purposes….and also heard unofficially from Japan that SST is not featured in RS due to a homologation issue with FIA and some say it is a reliability issue as MMC doesn’t want to tarnish their name in the race/rally arena…. confused….. confused….not knowing why not SST in RS even as an option.

Appreciate very much your inputs

Cheers!

Dinesh D.

http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f56/Bflaker/EVO%20X/182566379141.jpg
http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f56/Bflaker/EVO%20X/182566314501.jpg
http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f56/Bflaker/EVO%20X/182566807301.jpg
http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f56/Bflaker/EVO%20X/182566882181.jpg

benchmarking it against a WRX I see. Well it already wins hands down in the looks department :P

Wonder what hood treatment the final model will get. Surely not the same hood as the Evo?

hello all, there is a problem that i found on the evo x with sst gearbox!!! so i m facing the speed cut problem as the car only can reach 180km/h and will produce the speedcut, but my friend's car which is export model can drive reach 240km/h with standard!!!!

any solution of break the 180km/h, i was check from modifing pro shop and they say the HKS product not yet produce the evo x sst gearbox type but for normal 5 speed yes!!!!!:omg:

one thing i hate with the evo x compare to prtotype and concept is the wheel gap.....

do you think this is exactly the same wheels with MR, how about it's offset?

http://evoxforums.com/pre_forum/images/11-2008-mitsubishi-prototype-x.jpg

Is this just a thread for random thoughts? LOL at the last couple of posts!

^ heh well said Mac.

AK47 the prototype actually had 20's on there hence no dreaded arch gap.
These bbs's are actually made, but cost truckloads.