|Home||Forum Store||Members List||Calendar||Auto Loans||vBGarage||Photo Gallery||Search||Today's Posts||Mark Forums Read||Auto Escrow||Insurance|
|Automotive News, Articles & Pics Discussion for non Evo X related automotive news.|
||Thread Tools||Display Modes|
|01-21-2009, 12:11 AM||#1|
[Official forum bot]
Join Date: Aug 2007
Ironic legislation: CARB ruling to kill aftermarket plug-in hybrids?
Filed under: Hybrids/Alternative, Government/Legal, Green, I.C.E., Tech
The uncertain future of the alternative-powered and alternative-fueled vehicle is being decided by a confluence of old and new technology, big business and start-ups, marketing, vested interests, and public perception. It is no surprise, then, that when it comes to government regulation, we are bound to end up with some conflicting decisions. A company in California that converts regular hybrids to plug-in hybrids has found itself smack in the middle of one of those conflicts.
Last year, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) cut its mandated amount of electric vehicle sales in California by 70%. Some thought that might leave an exploitable opening for plug-in hybrids to gain serious market share. A number of start-ups have been established that install additional batteries into cars like the Toyota Prius, rendering them all electric below 34 mph, and allowing them to be recharged in 4 hours from a standard 3-prong outlet. The retrofit turns the 40+ mpg Prius into a 100+ mpg dromedary.
A new CARB proposal would require those start-ups to put their cars through smog tests that run about $25,000 per car, and to warranty their conversions for 10 years or 150,000 miles. The smog test issue has to do with a pollutant buildup issue in the catalytic converter and the gas vapor canister on cars that do a lot of cold starts and that might not use their internal combustion engines for more than three days. The warranty terms are the same as those mandated for any company that sells hybrids in California.
The start-ups say the pollutant issue has already been tested and solved by battery provider A123 systems, and it was approved in Massachusetts, a state that follows the same emissions standards as California. As for the warranty, the start-ups say they aren't altering the Prius, they are adding aftermarket batteries, so it doesn't make sense to force them to match the Prius' warranty. Besides that, the batteries they install are not expected to last ten years, so the warranty would be pointless anyway. The new regulations are expected to come into force next week anyway. Hat tip to reader Daniel
[Source: East Bay Express]Ironic legislation: CARB ruling to kill aftermarket plug-in hybrids? originally appeared on Autoblog on Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:58:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|New York 2008: Porsche GT2 dressed to kill in red with black rims||testdummy||Automotive News, Articles & Pics||0||03-20-2008 03:30 PM|
|Robots will kill you||Kooldino||Humor||3||03-14-2008 01:15 PM|
|General Motors study shows superiority of EREVs over plug-in hybrids||testdummy||Automotive News, Articles & Pics||2||02-15-2008 02:39 PM|
|EU calls on F1 to switch to four-cylinders, bio-fuels and hybrids||testdummy||Automotive News, Articles & Pics||0||01-16-2008 09:50 PM|