Hi Guys,
Right, so I wanted to post this and get some thoughts, before I blow something up

As far as I can tell, AMS recommend a maximum rev limit of 10,000rpm on their built motors (that utilise a stock stroke):
According to this website, this represents a maximum piston acceleration of 200984 fps^2
Now, given the tacho only goes upto 9k, and I would like to build a safety margin into AMS's limit, the 9000rpm limit results in a 162797 fps^2 max piston acceleration.
Now if we recalibrate the settings (say for a 2.5L 97mm stroke, 90mm bore) we get 162730 fps^2 using a limit of 8350rpm
So is it safe to assume, that if a built 2.0L can rev upto 9000, then a 2.5L can rev to 8350?
A lot of people in the past have been quoting mean piston speeds. Which in my opinion doesn't give the whole story. I think acceleration/deceleration is what breaks things, I assume that the acceleration = deceleration in a motor...
Thoughts?
Comments?
Thx!
D.
Right, so I wanted to post this and get some thoughts, before I blow something up
As far as I can tell, AMS recommend a maximum rev limit of 10,000rpm on their built motors (that utilise a stock stroke):
According to this website, this represents a maximum piston acceleration of 200984 fps^2
Now, given the tacho only goes upto 9k, and I would like to build a safety margin into AMS's limit, the 9000rpm limit results in a 162797 fps^2 max piston acceleration.
Now if we recalibrate the settings (say for a 2.5L 97mm stroke, 90mm bore) we get 162730 fps^2 using a limit of 8350rpm
So is it safe to assume, that if a built 2.0L can rev upto 9000, then a 2.5L can rev to 8350?
A lot of people in the past have been quoting mean piston speeds. Which in my opinion doesn't give the whole story. I think acceleration/deceleration is what breaks things, I assume that the acceleration = deceleration in a motor...
Thoughts?
Comments?
Thx!
D.