Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Forum banner
1 - 20 of 21 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
63 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
I am looking to get the licp kit. I have a injen intake and the injen upper icp. I was planning on getting the AMS front mount to go along with all of this. Is there fitment issues with using different kits?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
812 Posts
If it's a quality piece there shouldn't be any fitment issues. It's kinda pointless to do the licp since it won't generate gains like the uicp.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,138 Posts
I am looking to get the licp kit. I have a injen intake and the injen upper icp. I was planning on getting the AMS front mount to go along with all of this. Is there fitment issues with using different kits?
you should upgrade all the clamps to bolt clamps if you haven't done so already. Mine always came loose on the MR
 

· Registered
Joined
·
999 Posts
I have ran both the ets and ams on my ams fmic.. only fitment issue I had was when I switched to the AMS w/Tial QR option... a box style intake (think PW JDM) will not fit.. but no big deal if you are running an AMS or something along those lines
 

· Registered
Joined
·
812 Posts
I thought running the AMS w/ tial meant you had to use there intake?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
14,255 Posts
You dont need the AMS kit. You just need a hose that's long enough to run from the TiAL QR to the BOV inlet on whatever intake you have.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
999 Posts
You dont need the AMS kit. You just need a hose that's long enough to run from the TiAL QR to the BOV inlet on whatever intake you have.
This is correct... I ran it with an ETS intake (just cut up a spare mishimoto rad hose I had to make it work).. with the AMS intake and LICP together the supplied hose is precut for you... Like I said though a box style intake (PW JDM etc) wont fit due to the size and location of the QR. Hope that clarifies it
 

· Registered
Joined
·
999 Posts
Yea I have the CAI attachment but it rains too much in Hawaii to run it... owell, on the dyno in El Paso it only made 6 extra WHP over the AMS SRI
 

· Registered
Joined
·
999 Posts
yup... and it rains here for a week at a time... the ACTUAL gains over the SRI vs the slight risk plus having to change the filter ever 4-6 months at least arent worth it... 5whp is only important if you are more interested in building a dyno queen (which means you should run a t3/t4 setup not stockframe anyways), but to each his own. Eitherway, the AMS is coming off soon as it wont fit with my new setup ;)
 
1 - 20 of 21 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top