Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Forum banner
41 - 60 of 61 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
63 Posts
You have to match up the headers w/ the type of log, this ain't no pic'n'save (mix and match, lol).
I see you read my post in EvoM. Feel free to email me Kyle. Oh and FYI, Big Willow Feb 4th, if your interested.
Back to your regularly scheduled program....
I'm too poor to go to the track right now.
I'll probably be able to afford it sometime during late spring or summer. :afro:
 

· Registered
Joined
·
63 Posts
Okay, I may just be slow with all of this but, I had to redo my log because my computer crashed before I had time to change my tables.
So I redid my log and copied the headers in the new log exactly like hollywood did in my old log that he edited and it didn't work.
Is there something I'm missing here.
I also use OpenOffice if that makes a difference.
 

Attachments

· Registered
Joined
·
63 Posts
Not if problem with openoffice but the file is NOT csv and also the header contains " marks. That's what I see using excel
I promise I'm not stupid! Haha
It's gotta be OpenOffice because it shows it as a CSV and there aren't any quotes in the header.
I'll try downloading Excel when I get home from work.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
63 Posts
Ahhhh, perfect.
I just checked the settings and openoffice was setup to automatically tab seperate everything.
Thanks a lot! :hitit:
 

· Administrator
Joined
·
24,309 Posts
This program is WAY too picky about the headers.

Even if I copy and paste the format of the headers from your spec on the page (Evoscan ---> MAF,CruiseLTFT,STFT), it still won't accept it. If I change the first to MAF Voltage, it works.

Why not just do a string search for the word "MAF". If that word is in the column, then you know it must be what you're looking for. Ditto for ltft and stft.

Also - suggestions:

Consider allowing the user to paste in his current MAF scale so the program can do the mulitplications for you. This way, we don't have to manually multiply each cell.

Also consider showing us how many (or what percentage of the log) contains each voltage step. This way we know how reliable the number is.
 

· Administrator
Joined
·
24,309 Posts
Suggestion - have it spit out the average multiplier for 1v-2.66v. This would be handy for the first go-round when you're just getting things ballparked before you want to multiply each cell independently.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
39 Posts
Discussion Starter · #52 ·
This program is WAY too picky about the headers.

Even if I copy and paste the format of the headers from your spec on the page (Evoscan ---> MAF,CruiseLTFT,STFT), it still won't accept it. If I change the first to MAF Voltage, it works.

Why not just do a string search for the word "MAF". If that word is in the column, then you know it must be what you're looking for. Ditto for ltft and stft.

Also - suggestions:

Consider allowing the user to paste in his current MAF scale so the program can do the mulitplications for you. This way, we don't have to manually multiply each cell.

Also consider showing us how many (or what percentage of the log) contains each voltage step. This way we know how reliable the number is.

Thank you for the suggestions. I will see what I can do to make it easier to use.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,849 Posts
This program is WAY too picky about the headers.

Even if I copy and paste the format of the headers from your spec on the page (Evoscan ---> MAF,CruiseLTFT,STFT), it still won't accept it. If I change the first to MAF Voltage, it works.

Why not just do a string search for the word "MAF". If that word is in the column, then you know it must be what you're looking for. Ditto for ltft and stft.

Also - suggestions:

Consider allowing the user to paste in his current MAF scale so the program can do the mulitplications for you. This way, we don't have to manually multiply each cell.

Also consider showing us how many (or what percentage of the log) contains each voltage step. This way we know how reliable the number is.
Suggestion - have it spit out the average multiplier for 1v-2.66v. This would be handy for the first go-round when you're just getting things ballparked before you want to multiply each cell independently.
+1 those are both excellent suggestions!
 

· Administrator
Joined
·
24,309 Posts
There are problems with the output of this program. If you manually crunch the data, you'll see that AT TIMES it will recommend multiplying your scale by a number > 1 when it should really be < 1. This needs more testing...and it explains some things about my experience with it.

Also, not to threadjack, but I started developing an offline maf scaling java app:
http://www.evoxforums.com/forums/showthread.php?p=1090352#post1090352
 
41 - 60 of 61 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top